Tag Archive | "Nbsp"
Posted on 19 March 2013. Tags: Bat, Bench, Consistent Effort, Consistent Presence, Daniel Descalso, Dominoes, Incumbent, Matt Carpenter, Nbsp, New Position, Options, Outfield, Question Mark, Recognition Properties, Second Baseman, Smooth Transition, Spring Training, St Louis Cardinals, Swing, Tag, True Depth, Variety
The only position the St. Louis Cardinals and general manager John Mozeliak knew would be unsettled for certain entering spring training was second base. And now nearly a month later, it is a situation that is still sorting itself out. However, it’s not doing so because of injury or lack of options, rather it is doing so because of the positive performance of the three primary players in the picture. Matt Carpenter has made a smooth transition to the position in the field, while incumbent Daniel Descalso has risen to the occasion with at bat to justify his already superb glove work.

All the while, top prospect Kolten Wong has put up a consistent effort that has even further solidified the fact that his second baseman of the future tag is legit. Yet there are still questions to be considered, mainly who will see the majority of the play at the position in 2013, as well as what is in the system beyond just Wong. Is there true depth, or just a few name recognition properties? And how does this project the three-to-five year picture at a position the team has long struggled to have a consistent presence at?
St. Louis: The position entered the spring has a question mark, and has quickly turned into a win-win proposition. Both Descalso and Carpenter have performed well at the position, and have made a legitimate time split at the position a strong possibility this year. Carpenter has hit over .400 in the spring, while showing a consistent glove and throwing ability at his new position. Descalso on the other hand has stayed consistent in the field while making some adjustments to his swing that has seen him hit .292 through 16 games thus far in camp.
With both in the fold there is a chance for a variety of dominoes to go into play because of what having one or the other in the everyday lineup means. Carpenter has an impact at third and first base, as well as the outfield. He was the team’s best regular bench bat a year ago, and putting him in the everyday lineup does change both the versatility of the club off the bench, both in the field and at the plate. With Descalso in reserve, it gives the club a viable defensive upgrade in late game situations across the infield.
Yet moving ahead, the distinction of Cardinal second baseman most likely doesn’t involve either in a full-time capacity, as Wong has begun to make it clear his established role as middle infielder solidifier is legit.
High Minors: Wong will open the season at Triple-A Memphis despite a strong effort this spring thus far in Major League camp. He has swung the bat at a .292 clip through 16 spring games, and has displayed the range of talents that could make him factor into the picture by late in the summer. Whether he is pushed through to St. Louis this year before September has as much to do with his play (which has been an even .300 through his first two pro seasons) as it does with how the Carpenter/Descalso split works out. Getting him regular at-bats is an established point of emphasis for the team, as is continuing to evolve his defense.
After Wong, the system gets a bit more questionable at second base. Jose Garcia could factor into the picture every day at Springfield. The 24-year-old hit .260 while splitting time behind Wong and Greg Garcia at Double-A Springfield last summer.
Low Minors: Breyvic Valera reached Springfield last year after playing the majority of the year at Low-A Batavia, where he hit .316 for the year as a 19 year old. He could either play ahead at Springfield again this season, or start at High A Peoria this spring. In addition to him, the presence of Starlin Rodriguez (.315 average at Palm Beach in 2012), Ildemaro Vargas (.314 average across Rookie to High-A a year ago) and 10th round pick Jacob Wilson all will factor into the picture at the lower levels of the organization this season at second.
Prognosis: It’s an interesting situation developing at second base in the organization currently. While the lower minor league rungs of are sorting themselves out now with the ascension of Wong nearly complete, it is a position that definitely has both a secure future plan that is playing out as consistently as could be hoped.
With Carpenter potentially providing an everyday boost to the lineup offensively and Descalso being a plus defender, there is a real chance for Mike Matheny to “ride the hot hand” at second this season. In the immediate, Carpenter has continued to hit at his expected level, and the fact he has taken to the position so quickly in the field may be giving him the edge currently. But the plus that Descalso gives in the field cannot be taken lightly, especially in the light of Rafael Furcal being permanently out of the equation. The insertion of Wong into the St. Louis scene by next spring (at the very latest) assures that the second base role in St. Louis, as well as the domino rally created from it, is far from over.
Posted in Cardinals, Featured
Posted on 08 January 2013. Tags: All Star Game, Atlanta Braves, Baseball, Choices, Cooperstown, Election Announcement, Era, Four Men, Gf, Hall Of Fame, Ip, Ivie, Mike Stanton, Nbsp, New York Yankees, Profiles, Sv
With the Hall Of Fame election announcement coming on January 9, 2013, it is time to review the ballot, go over the names, and decide who belongs in the Hall Of Fame.
There are twenty four men on the ballot for the first time this year and we will take a look at each one individually prior to official announcements. You can find all of the profiles in the I-70 Baseball Exclusives: Cooperstown Choices 2013 menu at the top of the page.
In this article, we take a look at Mike Stanton

Mike Stanton
Stanton’s 19 year career would lead him to eight major league teams, most notably the Atlanta Braves and New York Yankees. In 2001, he would be selected to the American League roster for the All Star Game.
| Year |
Tm |
W |
L |
ERA |
G |
GF |
SV |
IP |
H |
R |
ER |
BB |
SO |
ERA+ |
SO/9 |
| 1989 |
ATL |
0 |
1 |
1.50 |
20 |
10 |
7 |
24.0 |
17 |
4 |
4 |
8 |
27 |
245 |
10.1 |
| 1990 |
ATL |
0 |
3 |
18.00 |
7 |
4 |
2 |
7.0 |
16 |
16 |
14 |
4 |
7 |
24 |
9.0 |
| 1991 |
ATL |
5 |
5 |
2.88 |
74 |
20 |
7 |
78.0 |
62 |
27 |
25 |
21 |
54 |
136 |
6.2 |
| 1992 |
ATL |
5 |
4 |
4.10 |
65 |
23 |
8 |
63.2 |
59 |
32 |
29 |
20 |
44 |
90 |
6.2 |
| 1993 |
ATL |
4 |
6 |
4.67 |
63 |
41 |
27 |
52.0 |
51 |
35 |
27 |
29 |
43 |
86 |
7.4 |
| 1994 |
ATL |
3 |
1 |
3.55 |
49 |
15 |
3 |
45.2 |
41 |
18 |
18 |
26 |
35 |
120 |
6.9 |
| 1995 |
TOT |
2 |
1 |
4.24 |
48 |
22 |
1 |
40.1 |
48 |
23 |
19 |
14 |
23 |
109 |
5.1 |
| 1995 |
ATL |
1 |
1 |
5.59 |
26 |
10 |
1 |
19.1 |
31 |
14 |
12 |
6 |
13 |
77 |
6.1 |
| 1995 |
BOS |
1 |
0 |
3.00 |
22 |
12 |
0 |
21.0 |
17 |
9 |
7 |
8 |
10 |
164 |
4.3 |
| 1996 |
TOT |
4 |
4 |
3.66 |
81 |
28 |
1 |
78.2 |
78 |
32 |
32 |
27 |
60 |
141 |
6.9 |
| 1996 |
BOS |
4 |
3 |
3.83 |
59 |
19 |
1 |
56.1 |
58 |
24 |
24 |
23 |
46 |
132 |
7.3 |
| 1996 |
TEX |
0 |
1 |
3.22 |
22 |
9 |
0 |
22.1 |
20 |
8 |
8 |
4 |
14 |
165 |
5.6 |
| 1997 |
NYY |
6 |
1 |
2.57 |
64 |
15 |
3 |
66.2 |
50 |
19 |
19 |
34 |
70 |
176 |
9.5 |
| 1998 |
NYY |
4 |
1 |
5.47 |
67 |
26 |
6 |
79.0 |
71 |
51 |
48 |
26 |
69 |
81 |
7.9 |
| 1999 |
NYY |
2 |
2 |
4.33 |
73 |
10 |
0 |
62.1 |
71 |
30 |
30 |
18 |
59 |
109 |
8.5 |
| 2000 |
NYY |
2 |
3 |
4.10 |
69 |
20 |
0 |
68.0 |
68 |
32 |
31 |
24 |
75 |
118 |
9.9 |
| 2001 |
NYY |
9 |
4 |
2.58 |
76 |
16 |
0 |
80.1 |
80 |
25 |
23 |
29 |
78 |
175 |
8.7 |
| 2002 |
NYY |
7 |
1 |
3.00 |
79 |
25 |
6 |
78.0 |
73 |
29 |
26 |
28 |
44 |
148 |
5.1 |
| 2003 |
NYM |
2 |
7 |
4.57 |
50 |
24 |
5 |
45.1 |
37 |
25 |
23 |
19 |
34 |
93 |
6.8 |
| 2004 |
NYM |
2 |
6 |
3.16 |
83 |
19 |
0 |
77.0 |
70 |
32 |
27 |
33 |
58 |
136 |
6.8 |
| 2005 |
TOT |
3 |
3 |
4.64 |
59 |
12 |
0 |
42.2 |
49 |
24 |
22 |
15 |
27 |
91 |
5.7 |
| 2005 |
TOT |
1 |
2 |
6.60 |
29 |
6 |
0 |
15.0 |
18 |
11 |
11 |
6 |
13 |
68 |
7.8 |
| 2005 |
NYY |
1 |
2 |
7.07 |
28 |
6 |
0 |
14.0 |
17 |
11 |
11 |
6 |
12 |
61 |
7.7 |
| 2005 |
WSN |
2 |
1 |
3.58 |
30 |
6 |
0 |
27.2 |
31 |
13 |
11 |
9 |
14 |
115 |
4.6 |
| 2005 |
BOS |
0 |
0 |
0.00 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1.0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
9.0 |
| 2006 |
TOT |
7 |
7 |
3.99 |
82 |
22 |
8 |
67.2 |
70 |
30 |
30 |
27 |
48 |
110 |
6.4 |
| 2006 |
WSN |
3 |
5 |
4.47 |
56 |
7 |
0 |
44.1 |
47 |
22 |
22 |
21 |
30 |
96 |
6.1 |
| 2006 |
SFG |
4 |
2 |
3.09 |
26 |
15 |
8 |
23.1 |
23 |
8 |
8 |
6 |
18 |
148 |
6.9 |
| 2007 |
CIN |
1 |
3 |
5.93 |
69 |
11 |
0 |
57.2 |
75 |
39 |
38 |
18 |
40 |
78 |
6.2 |
| 19 Yrs |
68 |
63 |
3.92 |
1178 |
363 |
84 |
1114.0 |
1086 |
523 |
485 |
420 |
895 |
112 |
7.2 |
| 162 Game Avg. |
4 |
4 |
3.92 |
68 |
21 |
5 |
64 |
63 |
30 |
28 |
24 |
52 |
112 |
7.2 |
|
W |
L |
ERA |
G |
GF |
SV |
IP |
H |
R |
ER |
BB |
SO |
ERA+ |
SO/9 |
| ATL (7 yrs) |
18 |
21 |
4.01 |
304 |
123 |
55 |
289.2 |
277 |
146 |
129 |
114 |
223 |
99 |
6.9 |
| NYY (7 yrs) |
31 |
14 |
3.77 |
456 |
118 |
15 |
448.1 |
430 |
197 |
188 |
165 |
407 |
121 |
8.2 |
| BOS (3 yrs) |
5 |
3 |
3.56 |
82 |
31 |
1 |
78.1 |
76 |
33 |
31 |
31 |
57 |
142 |
6.5 |
| NYM (2 yrs) |
4 |
13 |
3.68 |
133 |
43 |
5 |
122.1 |
107 |
57 |
50 |
52 |
92 |
116 |
6.8 |
| WSN (2 yrs) |
5 |
6 |
4.13 |
86 |
13 |
0 |
72.0 |
78 |
35 |
33 |
30 |
44 |
103 |
5.5 |
| SFG (1 yr) |
4 |
2 |
3.09 |
26 |
15 |
8 |
23.1 |
23 |
8 |
8 |
6 |
18 |
148 |
6.9 |
| TEX (1 yr) |
0 |
1 |
3.22 |
22 |
9 |
0 |
22.1 |
20 |
8 |
8 |
4 |
14 |
165 |
5.6 |
| CIN (1 yr) |
1 |
3 |
5.93 |
69 |
11 |
0 |
57.2 |
75 |
39 |
38 |
18 |
40 |
78 |
6.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| NL (12 yrs) |
32 |
45 |
4.11 |
618 |
205 |
68 |
565.0 |
560 |
285 |
258 |
220 |
417 |
101 |
6.6 |
| AL (9 yrs) |
36 |
18 |
3.72 |
560 |
158 |
16 |
549.0 |
526 |
238 |
227 |
200 |
478 |
125 |
7.8 |
Why He Should Get In
Stanton, while starting his career as a closer, established himself in the thankless role of being one of the best setup men in baseball. His longevity, durability and stability in the bullpen has him as one of the best players to do what he did.
Why He Should Not Get In
Unfortunately, what he did was something that most writers brush aside. He does not have the key numbers in wins, strikeouts, or saves to warrant his place in Cooperstown. A pitcher in the middle of a baseball game that did not start or close the game, makes it hard to qualify his place in history.
Bill Ivie is the editor here at I-70 Baseball
Follow him on Twitter here.
Posted in Cooperstown Choices 2013, I-70 Baseball Exclusives
Posted on 08 January 2013. Tags: 163, Baseball, Choices, Chw, Cooperstown, Cy Young, Cy Young Award, David Hall, David Wells, Election Announcement, Four Men, Hall Of Fame, Ip, Ivie, Major League, Nbsp, Nyy 16, Profiles, Tor 20, Tor 3
With the Hall Of Fame election announcement coming on January 9, 2013, it is time to review the ballot, go over the names, and decide who belongs in the Hall Of Fame.
There are twenty four men on the ballot for the first time this year and we will take a look at each one individually prior to official announcements. You can find all of the profiles in the I-70 Baseball Exclusives: Cooperstown Choices 2013 menu at the top of the page.
In this article, we take a look at David Wells

David Wells
The man known as “Boomer” would spend a remarkable 21 years with nine different major league teams. During his long career, he would be selected to three All Star rosters and finish third in the
Cy Young Award voting on two seperate occassions.
| Year |
Tm |
W |
L |
ERA |
G |
GS |
CG |
SHO |
IP |
H |
R |
ER |
BB |
SO |
ERA+ |
SO/9 |
| 1987 |
TOR |
4 |
3 |
3.99 |
18 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
29.1 |
37 |
14 |
13 |
12 |
32 |
115 |
9.8 |
| 1988 |
TOR |
3 |
5 |
4.62 |
41 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
64.1 |
65 |
36 |
33 |
31 |
56 |
85 |
7.8 |
| 1989 |
TOR |
7 |
4 |
2.40 |
54 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
86.1 |
66 |
25 |
23 |
28 |
78 |
153 |
8.1 |
| 1990 |
TOR |
11 |
6 |
3.14 |
43 |
25 |
0 |
0 |
189.0 |
165 |
72 |
66 |
45 |
115 |
131 |
5.5 |
| 1991 |
TOR |
15 |
10 |
3.72 |
40 |
28 |
2 |
0 |
198.1 |
188 |
88 |
82 |
49 |
106 |
114 |
4.8 |
| 1992 |
TOR |
7 |
9 |
5.40 |
41 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
120.0 |
138 |
84 |
72 |
36 |
62 |
76 |
4.7 |
| 1993 |
DET |
11 |
9 |
4.19 |
32 |
30 |
0 |
0 |
187.0 |
183 |
93 |
87 |
42 |
139 |
103 |
6.7 |
| 1994 |
DET |
5 |
7 |
3.96 |
16 |
16 |
5 |
1 |
111.1 |
113 |
54 |
49 |
24 |
71 |
123 |
5.7 |
| 1995 |
TOT |
16 |
8 |
3.24 |
29 |
29 |
6 |
0 |
203.0 |
194 |
88 |
73 |
53 |
133 |
141 |
5.9 |
| 1995 |
DET |
10 |
3 |
3.04 |
18 |
18 |
3 |
0 |
130.1 |
120 |
54 |
44 |
37 |
83 |
159 |
5.7 |
| 1995 |
CIN |
6 |
5 |
3.59 |
11 |
11 |
3 |
0 |
72.2 |
74 |
34 |
29 |
16 |
50 |
115 |
6.2 |
| 1996 |
BAL |
11 |
14 |
5.14 |
34 |
34 |
3 |
0 |
224.1 |
247 |
132 |
128 |
51 |
130 |
97 |
5.2 |
| 1997 |
NYY |
16 |
10 |
4.21 |
32 |
32 |
5 |
2 |
218.0 |
239 |
109 |
102 |
45 |
156 |
107 |
6.4 |
| 1998 |
NYY |
18 |
4 |
3.49 |
30 |
30 |
8 |
5 |
214.1 |
195 |
86 |
83 |
29 |
163 |
127 |
6.8 |
| 1999 |
TOR |
17 |
10 |
4.82 |
34 |
34 |
7 |
1 |
231.2 |
246 |
132 |
124 |
62 |
169 |
101 |
6.6 |
| 2000 |
TOR |
20 |
8 |
4.11 |
35 |
35 |
9 |
1 |
229.2 |
266 |
115 |
105 |
31 |
166 |
123 |
6.5 |
| 2001 |
CHW |
5 |
7 |
4.47 |
16 |
16 |
1 |
0 |
100.2 |
120 |
55 |
50 |
21 |
59 |
104 |
5.3 |
| 2002 |
NYY |
19 |
7 |
3.75 |
31 |
31 |
2 |
1 |
206.1 |
210 |
100 |
86 |
45 |
137 |
118 |
6.0 |
| 2003 |
NYY |
15 |
7 |
4.14 |
31 |
30 |
4 |
1 |
213.0 |
242 |
101 |
98 |
20 |
101 |
106 |
4.3 |
| 2004 |
SDP |
12 |
8 |
3.73 |
31 |
31 |
0 |
0 |
195.2 |
203 |
85 |
81 |
20 |
101 |
104 |
4.6 |
| 2005 |
BOS |
15 |
7 |
4.45 |
30 |
30 |
2 |
0 |
184.0 |
220 |
95 |
91 |
21 |
107 |
102 |
5.2 |
| 2006 |
TOT |
3 |
5 |
4.42 |
13 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
75.1 |
97 |
41 |
37 |
12 |
38 |
102 |
4.5 |
| 2006 |
BOS |
2 |
3 |
4.98 |
8 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
47.0 |
64 |
30 |
26 |
8 |
24 |
96 |
4.6 |
| 2006 |
SDP |
1 |
2 |
3.49 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
28.1 |
33 |
11 |
11 |
4 |
14 |
117 |
4.4 |
| 2007 |
TOT |
9 |
9 |
5.43 |
29 |
29 |
0 |
0 |
157.1 |
201 |
97 |
95 |
42 |
82 |
76 |
4.7 |
| 2007 |
SDP |
5 |
8 |
5.54 |
22 |
22 |
0 |
0 |
118.2 |
156 |
74 |
73 |
33 |
63 |
72 |
4.8 |
| 2007 |
LAD |
4 |
1 |
5.12 |
7 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
38.2 |
45 |
23 |
22 |
9 |
19 |
87 |
4.4 |
| 21 Yrs |
239 |
157 |
4.13 |
660 |
489 |
54 |
12 |
3439.0 |
3635 |
1702 |
1578 |
719 |
2201 |
108 |
5.8 |
| 162 Game Avg. |
14 |
9 |
4.13 |
39 |
29 |
3 |
1 |
204 |
215 |
101 |
93 |
43 |
130 |
108 |
5.8 |
|
W |
L |
ERA |
G |
GS |
CG |
SHO |
IP |
H |
R |
ER |
BB |
SO |
ERA+ |
SO/9 |
| TOR (8 yrs) |
84 |
55 |
4.06 |
306 |
138 |
18 |
2 |
1148.2 |
1171 |
566 |
518 |
294 |
784 |
110 |
6.1 |
| NYY (4 yrs) |
68 |
28 |
3.90 |
124 |
123 |
19 |
9 |
851.2 |
886 |
396 |
369 |
139 |
557 |
114 |
5.9 |
| SDP (3 yrs) |
18 |
18 |
4.33 |
58 |
58 |
0 |
0 |
342.2 |
392 |
170 |
165 |
57 |
178 |
91 |
4.7 |
| DET (3 yrs) |
26 |
19 |
3.78 |
66 |
64 |
8 |
1 |
428.2 |
416 |
201 |
180 |
103 |
293 |
122 |
6.2 |
| BOS (2 yrs) |
17 |
10 |
4.56 |
38 |
38 |
2 |
0 |
231.0 |
284 |
125 |
117 |
29 |
131 |
101 |
5.1 |
| LAD (1 yr) |
4 |
1 |
5.12 |
7 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
38.2 |
45 |
23 |
22 |
9 |
19 |
87 |
4.4 |
| CIN (1 yr) |
6 |
5 |
3.59 |
11 |
11 |
3 |
0 |
72.2 |
74 |
34 |
29 |
16 |
50 |
115 |
6.2 |
| BAL (1 yr) |
11 |
14 |
5.14 |
34 |
34 |
3 |
0 |
224.1 |
247 |
132 |
128 |
51 |
130 |
97 |
5.2 |
| CHW (1 yr) |
5 |
7 |
4.47 |
16 |
16 |
1 |
0 |
100.2 |
120 |
55 |
50 |
21 |
59 |
104 |
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| AL (19 yrs) |
211 |
133 |
4.11 |
584 |
413 |
51 |
12 |
2985.0 |
3124 |
1475 |
1362 |
637 |
1954 |
110 |
5.9 |
| NL (4 yrs) |
28 |
24 |
4.28 |
76 |
76 |
3 |
0 |
454.0 |
511 |
227 |
216 |
82 |
247 |
94 |
4.9 |
Why He Should Get In
Boomer’s career numbers fall just short of the typical yardsticks we use for Cooperstown enshrinement, but that’s not to say he wasn’t a solid player. While he only got to the coveted 20-win plateua once, he did find himself real close to it on multiple occassions. He spent a good portion of his career pitching for losing ball clubs, which took an impact on his numbers.
Why He Should Not Get In
Losing clubs or not, Wells is not a Hall Of Famer. His win total (239), strikeout total (2,201), strikeouts per nine innings (5.8) and earned run average (4.13) do not put him on par with his peers in Cooperstown. Wells was a good, not great, pitcher.
Bill Ivie is the editor here at I-70 Baseball
Follow him on Twitter here.
Posted in Cooperstown Choices 2013, I-70 Baseball Exclusives
Posted on 08 January 2013. Tags: 911, Assignment Editor, Baseball, Choices, Chw, Cooperstown, Election Announcement, Four Men, Game, Hall Of Fame, Ivie, Major League Baseball, Nbsp, Ops, Profiles, Radio, Rbi, Sammy Sosa, Silver Sluggers, Veteran
With the Hall Of Fame election announcement coming on January 9, 2013, it is time to review the ballot, go over the names, and decide who belongs in the Hall Of Fame.
There are twenty four men on the ballot for the first time this year and we will take a look at each one individually prior to official announcements. You can find all of the profiles in the I-70 Baseball Exclusives: Cooperstown Choices 2013 menu at the top of the page.
In this article, we take a look at Sammy Sosa

Sammy Sosa
An eighteen year veteran of major league baseball, Sosa saw time with four teams during his career. During his career, he would be selected to seven All Star rosters as well as be awarded six Silver Sluggers and one Most Valuable Player Award.
| Year |
Tm |
G |
AB |
R |
H |
2B |
3B |
HR |
RBI |
SB |
BB |
SO |
BA |
OBP |
SLG |
OPS |
OPS+ |
| 1989 |
TOT |
58 |
183 |
27 |
47 |
8 |
0 |
4 |
13 |
7 |
11 |
47 |
.257 |
.303 |
.366 |
.669 |
89 |
| 1989 |
TEX |
25 |
84 |
8 |
20 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
.238 |
.238 |
.310 |
.548 |
52 |
| 1989 |
CHW |
33 |
99 |
19 |
27 |
5 |
0 |
3 |
10 |
7 |
11 |
27 |
.273 |
.351 |
.414 |
.765 |
118 |
| 1990 |
CHW |
153 |
532 |
72 |
124 |
26 |
10 |
15 |
70 |
32 |
33 |
150 |
.233 |
.282 |
.404 |
.687 |
92 |
| 1991 |
CHW |
116 |
316 |
39 |
64 |
10 |
1 |
10 |
33 |
13 |
14 |
98 |
.203 |
.240 |
.335 |
.576 |
59 |
| 1992 |
CHC |
67 |
262 |
41 |
68 |
7 |
2 |
8 |
25 |
15 |
19 |
63 |
.260 |
.317 |
.393 |
.710 |
98 |
| 1993 |
CHC |
159 |
598 |
92 |
156 |
25 |
5 |
33 |
93 |
36 |
38 |
135 |
.261 |
.309 |
.485 |
.794 |
112 |
| 1994 |
CHC |
105 |
426 |
59 |
128 |
17 |
6 |
25 |
70 |
22 |
25 |
92 |
.300 |
.339 |
.545 |
.884 |
127 |
| 1995 |
CHC |
144 |
564 |
89 |
151 |
17 |
3 |
36 |
119 |
34 |
58 |
134 |
.268 |
.340 |
.500 |
.840 |
122 |
| 1996 |
CHC |
124 |
498 |
84 |
136 |
21 |
2 |
40 |
100 |
18 |
34 |
134 |
.273 |
.323 |
.564 |
.888 |
127 |
| 1997 |
CHC |
162 |
642 |
90 |
161 |
31 |
4 |
36 |
119 |
22 |
45 |
174 |
.251 |
.300 |
.480 |
.779 |
99 |
| 1998 |
CHC |
159 |
643 |
134 |
198 |
20 |
0 |
66 |
158 |
18 |
73 |
171 |
.308 |
.377 |
.647 |
1.024 |
160 |
| 1999 |
CHC |
162 |
625 |
114 |
180 |
24 |
2 |
63 |
141 |
7 |
78 |
171 |
.288 |
.367 |
.635 |
1.002 |
151 |
| 2000 |
CHC |
156 |
604 |
106 |
193 |
38 |
1 |
50 |
138 |
7 |
91 |
168 |
.320 |
.406 |
.634 |
1.040 |
161 |
| 2001 |
CHC |
160 |
577 |
146 |
189 |
34 |
5 |
64 |
160 |
0 |
116 |
153 |
.328 |
.437 |
.737 |
1.174 |
203 |
| 2002 |
CHC |
150 |
556 |
122 |
160 |
19 |
2 |
49 |
108 |
2 |
103 |
144 |
.288 |
.399 |
.594 |
.993 |
160 |
| 2003 |
CHC |
137 |
517 |
99 |
144 |
22 |
0 |
40 |
103 |
0 |
62 |
143 |
.279 |
.358 |
.553 |
.911 |
133 |
| 2004 |
CHC |
126 |
478 |
69 |
121 |
21 |
0 |
35 |
80 |
0 |
56 |
133 |
.253 |
.332 |
.517 |
.849 |
114 |
| 2005 |
BAL |
102 |
380 |
39 |
84 |
15 |
1 |
14 |
45 |
1 |
39 |
84 |
.221 |
.295 |
.376 |
.671 |
78 |
| 2007 |
TEX |
114 |
412 |
53 |
104 |
24 |
1 |
21 |
92 |
0 |
34 |
112 |
.252 |
.311 |
.468 |
.779 |
101 |
| 18 Yrs |
2354 |
8813 |
1475 |
2408 |
379 |
45 |
609 |
1667 |
234 |
929 |
2306 |
.273 |
.344 |
.534 |
.878 |
128 |
| 162 Game Avg. |
162 |
607 |
102 |
166 |
26 |
3 |
42 |
115 |
16 |
64 |
159 |
.273 |
.344 |
.534 |
.878 |
128 |
|
G |
AB |
R |
H |
2B |
3B |
HR |
RBI |
SB |
BB |
SO |
BA |
OBP |
SLG |
OPS |
OPS+ |
| CHC (13 yrs) |
1811 |
6990 |
1245 |
1985 |
296 |
32 |
545 |
1414 |
181 |
798 |
1815 |
.284 |
.358 |
.569 |
.928 |
139 |
| CHW (3 yrs) |
302 |
947 |
130 |
215 |
41 |
11 |
28 |
113 |
52 |
58 |
275 |
.227 |
.276 |
.382 |
.659 |
84 |
| TEX (2 yrs) |
139 |
496 |
61 |
124 |
27 |
1 |
22 |
95 |
0 |
34 |
132 |
.250 |
.299 |
.442 |
.741 |
94 |
| BAL (1 yr) |
102 |
380 |
39 |
84 |
15 |
1 |
14 |
45 |
1 |
39 |
84 |
.221 |
.295 |
.376 |
.671 |
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| NL (13 yrs) |
1811 |
6990 |
1245 |
1985 |
296 |
32 |
545 |
1414 |
181 |
798 |
1815 |
.284 |
.358 |
.569 |
.928 |
139 |
| AL (5 yrs) |
543 |
1823 |
230 |
423 |
83 |
13 |
64 |
253 |
53 |
131 |
491 |
.232 |
.287 |
.397 |
.684 |
86 |
Why He Should Get In
His home run (609) and runs batted in (1,667) totals speak loudly enough about a Hall Of Fame career. Add in 2,408 hits, 234 stolen bases and 929 walks and it is easy to see that Sammy was a well-rounded player that brought more than just a big bat to the teams he played for.
Why He Should Not Get In
More than just about any other player, Sammy will feel the strain of the steroid era. A player that was perceived to be average for most of his career, Sosa’s numbers ballooned quickly without explanation around 1998 and stayed at that level until 2002. The voters will most likely use Sosa as an example in their voting for some time to come.
Bill Ivie is the editor here at I-70 Baseball
Follow him on Twitter here.
Posted in Cooperstown Choices 2013, I-70 Baseball Exclusives
Posted on 08 January 2013. Tags: Baseball, Brother, Choices, Chw, Cleveland Indians, Cooperstown, Election Announcement, Few More Years, Four Men, Gold Glove, Hall Of Fame, Ivie, Lad, Nbsp, Ops, Profiles, Rbi, Sandy Alomar
With the Hall Of Fame election announcement coming on January 9, 2013, it is time to review the ballot, go over the names, and decide who belongs in the Hall Of Fame.
There are twenty four men on the ballot for the first time this year and we will take a look at each one individually prior to official announcements. You can find all of the profiles in the I-70 Baseball Exclusives: Cooperstown Choices 2013 menu at the top of the page.
In this article, we take a look at Sandy Alomar

Sandy Alomar
The older of the Alomar brothers, Sandy stayed in baseball a few more years than his brother Roberto. Over his 20 year career, he would play for seven major league teams, most notably with the Cleveland Indians where he won the Rookie Of The Year award in 1990. He would win his first and only Gold Glove that same year and make his first of six All Star rosters, all with the Indians.
| Year |
Tm |
G |
AB |
R |
H |
2B |
3B |
HR |
RBI |
SB |
BB |
SO |
BA |
OBP |
SLG |
OPS |
OPS+ |
| 1988 |
SDP |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
.000 |
.000 |
.000 |
.000 |
-100 |
| 1989 |
SDP |
7 |
19 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
.211 |
.318 |
.421 |
.739 |
109 |
| 1990 |
CLE |
132 |
445 |
60 |
129 |
26 |
2 |
9 |
66 |
4 |
25 |
46 |
.290 |
.326 |
.418 |
.744 |
108 |
| 1991 |
CLE |
51 |
184 |
10 |
40 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
8 |
24 |
.217 |
.264 |
.266 |
.530 |
47 |
| 1992 |
CLE |
89 |
299 |
22 |
75 |
16 |
0 |
2 |
26 |
3 |
13 |
32 |
.251 |
.293 |
.324 |
.618 |
75 |
| 1993 |
CLE |
64 |
215 |
24 |
58 |
7 |
1 |
6 |
32 |
3 |
11 |
28 |
.270 |
.318 |
.395 |
.713 |
91 |
| 1994 |
CLE |
80 |
292 |
44 |
84 |
15 |
1 |
14 |
43 |
8 |
25 |
31 |
.288 |
.347 |
.490 |
.837 |
115 |
| 1995 |
CLE |
66 |
203 |
32 |
61 |
6 |
0 |
10 |
35 |
3 |
7 |
26 |
.300 |
.332 |
.478 |
.810 |
107 |
| 1996 |
CLE |
127 |
418 |
53 |
110 |
23 |
0 |
11 |
50 |
1 |
19 |
42 |
.263 |
.299 |
.397 |
.696 |
75 |
| 1997 |
CLE |
125 |
451 |
63 |
146 |
37 |
0 |
21 |
83 |
0 |
19 |
48 |
.324 |
.354 |
.545 |
.900 |
128 |
| 1998 |
CLE |
117 |
409 |
45 |
96 |
26 |
2 |
6 |
44 |
0 |
18 |
45 |
.235 |
.270 |
.352 |
.622 |
59 |
| 1999 |
CLE |
37 |
137 |
19 |
42 |
13 |
0 |
6 |
25 |
0 |
4 |
23 |
.307 |
.322 |
.533 |
.855 |
111 |
| 2000 |
CLE |
97 |
356 |
44 |
103 |
16 |
2 |
7 |
42 |
2 |
16 |
41 |
.289 |
.324 |
.404 |
.728 |
83 |
| 2001 |
CHW |
70 |
220 |
17 |
54 |
8 |
1 |
4 |
21 |
1 |
12 |
17 |
.245 |
.288 |
.345 |
.634 |
64 |
| 2002 |
TOT |
89 |
283 |
29 |
79 |
14 |
1 |
7 |
37 |
0 |
9 |
33 |
.279 |
.302 |
.410 |
.712 |
82 |
| 2002 |
CHW |
51 |
167 |
21 |
48 |
10 |
1 |
7 |
25 |
0 |
5 |
14 |
.287 |
.309 |
.485 |
.794 |
106 |
| 2002 |
COL |
38 |
116 |
8 |
31 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
4 |
19 |
.267 |
.292 |
.302 |
.593 |
48 |
| 2003 |
CHW |
75 |
194 |
22 |
52 |
12 |
0 |
5 |
26 |
0 |
4 |
17 |
.268 |
.281 |
.407 |
.689 |
78 |
| 2004 |
CHW |
50 |
146 |
15 |
35 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
14 |
0 |
11 |
13 |
.240 |
.298 |
.308 |
.606 |
58 |
| 2005 |
TEX |
46 |
128 |
11 |
35 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
5 |
12 |
.273 |
.306 |
.328 |
.634 |
66 |
| 2006 |
TOT |
46 |
108 |
8 |
30 |
8 |
0 |
1 |
17 |
0 |
3 |
14 |
.278 |
.292 |
.380 |
.672 |
70 |
| 2006 |
LAD |
27 |
62 |
3 |
20 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
.323 |
.323 |
.403 |
.726 |
84 |
| 2006 |
CHW |
19 |
46 |
5 |
10 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
0 |
3 |
7 |
.217 |
.255 |
.348 |
.603 |
52 |
| 2007 |
NYM |
8 |
22 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
.136 |
.136 |
.182 |
.318 |
-18 |
| 20 Yrs |
1377 |
4530 |
520 |
1236 |
249 |
10 |
112 |
588 |
25 |
212 |
499 |
.273 |
.309 |
.406 |
.716 |
86 |
| 162 Game Avg. |
162 |
533 |
61 |
145 |
29 |
1 |
13 |
69 |
3 |
25 |
59 |
.273 |
.309 |
.406 |
.716 |
86 |
|
G |
AB |
R |
H |
2B |
3B |
HR |
RBI |
SB |
BB |
SO |
BA |
OBP |
SLG |
OPS |
OPS+ |
| CLE (11 yrs) |
985 |
3409 |
416 |
944 |
194 |
8 |
92 |
453 |
24 |
165 |
386 |
.277 |
.315 |
.419 |
.734 |
92 |
| CHW (5 yrs) |
265 |
773 |
80 |
199 |
37 |
2 |
19 |
94 |
1 |
35 |
68 |
.257 |
.291 |
.384 |
.675 |
74 |
| SDP (2 yrs) |
8 |
20 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
.200 |
.304 |
.400 |
.704 |
100 |
| NYM (1 yr) |
8 |
22 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
.136 |
.136 |
.182 |
.318 |
-18 |
| COL (1 yr) |
38 |
116 |
8 |
31 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
4 |
19 |
.267 |
.292 |
.302 |
.593 |
48 |
| LAD (1 yr) |
27 |
62 |
3 |
20 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
.323 |
.323 |
.403 |
.726 |
84 |
| TEX (1 yr) |
46 |
128 |
11 |
35 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
5 |
12 |
.273 |
.306 |
.328 |
.634 |
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| AL (17 yrs) |
1296 |
4310 |
507 |
1178 |
238 |
10 |
111 |
561 |
25 |
205 |
466 |
.273 |
.310 |
.410 |
.721 |
88 |
| NL (5 yrs) |
81 |
220 |
13 |
58 |
11 |
0 |
1 |
27 |
0 |
7 |
33 |
.264 |
.286 |
.327 |
.614 |
56 |
Why He Should Get In
Alomar’s career was embodied behind the scenes. A field general and leader, he was another coach on the field.
Why He Should Not Get In
In short, his numbers just don’t stack up. While it would be easier to stomach the low offensive numbers based on his presence defensively, he would need to have a few more awards from that side of the diamond. With out the Gold Gloves to back him up, the offensive shortcomings will keep him from election.
Bill Ivie is the editor here at I-70 Baseball
Follow him on Twitter here.
Posted in Cooperstown Choices 2013, I-70 Baseball Exclusives
Posted on 08 January 2013. Tags: Avg, Baseball, Choices, Cooperstown, Election Announcement, Four Men, Game, Hall Of Fame, Ivie, League Rosters, Major League, Nbsp, Ops, Profiles, Rbi, Reggie Sanders, Star Game
With the Hall Of Fame election announcement coming on January 9, 2013, it is time to review the ballot, go over the names, and decide who belongs in the Hall Of Fame.
There are twenty four men on the ballot for the first time this year and we will take a look at each one individually prior to official announcements. You can find all of the profiles in the I-70 Baseball Exclusives: Cooperstown Choices 2013 menu at the top of the page.
In this article, we take a look at Reggie Sanders

Reggie Sanders
Reggie’s 17-year career placed him on eight major league rosters. He was selected to the 1995 All Star Game.
| Year |
Tm |
G |
AB |
R |
H |
2B |
3B |
HR |
RBI |
SB |
BB |
SO |
BA |
OBP |
SLG |
OPS |
OPS+ |
| 1991 |
CIN |
9 |
40 |
6 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
9 |
.200 |
.200 |
.275 |
.475 |
31 |
| 1992 |
CIN |
116 |
385 |
62 |
104 |
26 |
6 |
12 |
36 |
16 |
48 |
98 |
.270 |
.356 |
.462 |
.819 |
127 |
| 1993 |
CIN |
138 |
496 |
90 |
136 |
16 |
4 |
20 |
83 |
27 |
51 |
118 |
.274 |
.343 |
.444 |
.786 |
109 |
| 1994 |
CIN |
107 |
400 |
66 |
105 |
20 |
8 |
17 |
62 |
21 |
41 |
114 |
.263 |
.332 |
.480 |
.812 |
110 |
| 1995 |
CIN |
133 |
484 |
91 |
148 |
36 |
6 |
28 |
99 |
36 |
69 |
122 |
.306 |
.397 |
.579 |
.975 |
155 |
| 1996 |
CIN |
81 |
287 |
49 |
72 |
17 |
1 |
14 |
33 |
24 |
44 |
86 |
.251 |
.353 |
.463 |
.817 |
114 |
| 1997 |
CIN |
86 |
312 |
52 |
79 |
19 |
2 |
19 |
56 |
13 |
42 |
93 |
.253 |
.347 |
.510 |
.857 |
120 |
| 1998 |
CIN |
135 |
481 |
83 |
129 |
18 |
6 |
14 |
59 |
20 |
51 |
137 |
.268 |
.346 |
.418 |
.764 |
99 |
| 1999 |
SDP |
133 |
478 |
92 |
136 |
24 |
7 |
26 |
72 |
36 |
65 |
108 |
.285 |
.376 |
.527 |
.904 |
134 |
| 2000 |
ATL |
103 |
340 |
43 |
79 |
23 |
1 |
11 |
37 |
21 |
32 |
78 |
.232 |
.302 |
.403 |
.705 |
76 |
| 2001 |
ARI |
126 |
441 |
84 |
116 |
21 |
3 |
33 |
90 |
14 |
46 |
126 |
.263 |
.337 |
.549 |
.886 |
117 |
| 2002 |
SFG |
140 |
505 |
75 |
126 |
23 |
6 |
23 |
85 |
18 |
47 |
121 |
.250 |
.324 |
.455 |
.779 |
107 |
| 2003 |
PIT |
130 |
453 |
74 |
129 |
27 |
4 |
31 |
87 |
15 |
38 |
110 |
.285 |
.345 |
.567 |
.913 |
131 |
| 2004 |
STL |
135 |
446 |
64 |
116 |
27 |
3 |
22 |
67 |
21 |
33 |
118 |
.260 |
.315 |
.482 |
.797 |
103 |
| 2005 |
STL |
93 |
295 |
49 |
80 |
14 |
2 |
21 |
54 |
14 |
28 |
75 |
.271 |
.340 |
.546 |
.886 |
127 |
| 2006 |
KCR |
88 |
325 |
45 |
80 |
23 |
1 |
11 |
49 |
7 |
28 |
86 |
.246 |
.304 |
.425 |
.729 |
86 |
| 2007 |
KCR |
24 |
73 |
12 |
23 |
7 |
0 |
2 |
11 |
0 |
11 |
15 |
.315 |
.412 |
.493 |
.905 |
138 |
| 17 Yrs |
1777 |
6241 |
1037 |
1666 |
341 |
60 |
305 |
983 |
304 |
674 |
1614 |
.267 |
.343 |
.487 |
.830 |
115 |
| 162 Game Avg. |
162 |
569 |
95 |
152 |
31 |
5 |
28 |
90 |
28 |
61 |
147 |
.267 |
.343 |
.487 |
.830 |
115 |
|
G |
AB |
R |
H |
2B |
3B |
HR |
RBI |
SB |
BB |
SO |
BA |
OBP |
SLG |
OPS |
OPS+ |
| CIN (8 yrs) |
805 |
2885 |
499 |
781 |
152 |
33 |
125 |
431 |
158 |
346 |
777 |
.271 |
.353 |
.476 |
.829 |
118 |
| KCR (2 yrs) |
112 |
398 |
57 |
103 |
30 |
1 |
13 |
60 |
7 |
39 |
101 |
.259 |
.325 |
.437 |
.762 |
95 |
| STL (2 yrs) |
228 |
741 |
113 |
196 |
41 |
5 |
43 |
121 |
35 |
61 |
193 |
.265 |
.325 |
.507 |
.833 |
113 |
| ARI (1 yr) |
126 |
441 |
84 |
116 |
21 |
3 |
33 |
90 |
14 |
46 |
126 |
.263 |
.337 |
.549 |
.886 |
117 |
| PIT (1 yr) |
130 |
453 |
74 |
129 |
27 |
4 |
31 |
87 |
15 |
38 |
110 |
.285 |
.345 |
.567 |
.913 |
131 |
| SFG (1 yr) |
140 |
505 |
75 |
126 |
23 |
6 |
23 |
85 |
18 |
47 |
121 |
.250 |
.324 |
.455 |
.779 |
107 |
| ATL (1 yr) |
103 |
340 |
43 |
79 |
23 |
1 |
11 |
37 |
21 |
32 |
78 |
.232 |
.302 |
.403 |
.705 |
76 |
| SDP (1 yr) |
133 |
478 |
92 |
136 |
24 |
7 |
26 |
72 |
36 |
65 |
108 |
.285 |
.376 |
.527 |
.904 |
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| NL (15 yrs) |
1665 |
5843 |
980 |
1563 |
311 |
59 |
292 |
923 |
297 |
635 |
1513 |
.267 |
.344 |
.491 |
.835 |
116 |
| AL (2 yrs) |
112 |
398 |
57 |
103 |
30 |
1 |
13 |
60 |
7 |
39 |
101 |
.259 |
.325 |
.437 |
.762 |
95 |
Why He Should Get In
Sanders was a rounded player that hit 305 home runs and stole 304 bases over the course of his career.
Why He Should Not Get In
His overall numbers fall short with less than 2,000 hits, less than 1,000 runs batted in, and less than 400 doubles. He was a good, not great, baseball player.
Bill Ivie is the editor here at I-70 Baseball
Follow him on Twitter here.
Posted in Cooperstown Choices 2013, I-70 Baseball Exclusives
Posted on 08 January 2013. Tags: 411, All Star, Baseball, Choices, Chw, Cooperstown, Election Announcement, Era, Four Men, Game, Gf, Hall Of Fame, Ip, Ivie, Lad, Nbsp, Phi, Profiles, Relief Pitcher, Roberto Hernandez, Sv, Tampa Bay, White Sox
With the Hall Of Fame election announcement coming on January 9, 2013, it is time to review the ballot, go over the names, and decide who belongs in the Hall Of Fame.
There are twenty four men on the ballot for the first time this year and we will take a look at each one individually prior to official announcements. You can find all of the profiles in the I-70 Baseball Exclusives: Cooperstown Choices 2013 menu at the top of the page.
In this article, we take a look at Roberto Hernandez

Roberto Hernandez
Ten teams would host Hernandez as a relief pitcher over his 17 year career. He would be selected as an All Star in 1996 with the White Sox and 1999 with Tampa Bay.
| Year |
Tm |
W |
L |
ERA |
G |
GF |
SV |
IP |
H |
R |
ER |
BB |
SO |
ERA+ |
SO/9 |
| 1991 |
CHW |
1 |
0 |
7.80 |
9 |
1 |
0 |
15.0 |
18 |
15 |
13 |
7 |
6 |
52 |
3.6 |
| 1992 |
CHW |
7 |
3 |
1.65 |
43 |
27 |
12 |
71.0 |
45 |
15 |
13 |
20 |
68 |
236 |
8.6 |
| 1993 |
CHW |
3 |
4 |
2.29 |
70 |
67 |
38 |
78.2 |
66 |
21 |
20 |
20 |
71 |
185 |
8.1 |
| 1994 |
CHW |
4 |
4 |
4.91 |
45 |
43 |
14 |
47.2 |
44 |
29 |
26 |
19 |
50 |
96 |
9.4 |
| 1995 |
CHW |
3 |
7 |
3.92 |
60 |
57 |
32 |
59.2 |
63 |
30 |
26 |
28 |
84 |
115 |
12.7 |
| 1996 |
CHW |
6 |
5 |
1.91 |
72 |
61 |
38 |
84.2 |
65 |
21 |
18 |
38 |
85 |
249 |
9.0 |
| 1997 |
TOT |
10 |
3 |
2.45 |
74 |
50 |
31 |
80.2 |
67 |
24 |
22 |
38 |
82 |
176 |
9.1 |
| 1997 |
CHW |
5 |
1 |
2.44 |
46 |
43 |
27 |
48.0 |
38 |
15 |
13 |
24 |
47 |
181 |
8.8 |
| 1997 |
SFG |
5 |
2 |
2.48 |
28 |
7 |
4 |
32.2 |
29 |
9 |
9 |
14 |
35 |
168 |
9.6 |
| 1998 |
TBD |
2 |
6 |
4.04 |
67 |
58 |
26 |
71.1 |
55 |
33 |
32 |
41 |
55 |
118 |
6.9 |
| 1999 |
TBD |
2 |
3 |
3.07 |
72 |
66 |
43 |
73.1 |
68 |
27 |
25 |
33 |
69 |
161 |
8.5 |
| 2000 |
TBD |
4 |
7 |
3.19 |
68 |
58 |
32 |
73.1 |
76 |
33 |
26 |
23 |
61 |
155 |
7.5 |
| 2001 |
KCR |
5 |
6 |
4.12 |
63 |
55 |
28 |
67.2 |
69 |
34 |
31 |
26 |
46 |
117 |
6.1 |
| 2002 |
KCR |
1 |
3 |
4.33 |
53 |
42 |
26 |
52.0 |
62 |
29 |
25 |
12 |
39 |
115 |
6.8 |
| 2003 |
ATL |
5 |
3 |
4.35 |
66 |
12 |
0 |
60.0 |
61 |
36 |
29 |
43 |
45 |
99 |
6.8 |
| 2004 |
PHI |
3 |
5 |
4.76 |
63 |
11 |
0 |
56.2 |
66 |
39 |
30 |
29 |
44 |
95 |
7.0 |
| 2005 |
NYM |
8 |
6 |
2.58 |
67 |
20 |
4 |
69.2 |
57 |
20 |
20 |
28 |
61 |
160 |
7.9 |
| 2006 |
TOT |
0 |
3 |
3.11 |
68 |
19 |
2 |
63.2 |
61 |
32 |
22 |
32 |
48 |
144 |
6.8 |
| 2006 |
PIT |
0 |
3 |
2.93 |
46 |
14 |
2 |
43.0 |
46 |
24 |
14 |
24 |
33 |
153 |
6.9 |
| 2006 |
NYM |
0 |
0 |
3.48 |
22 |
5 |
0 |
20.2 |
15 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
15 |
127 |
6.5 |
| 2007 |
TOT |
3 |
3 |
6.41 |
50 |
20 |
0 |
46.1 |
59 |
37 |
33 |
25 |
31 |
71 |
6.0 |
| 2007 |
CLE |
3 |
1 |
6.23 |
28 |
8 |
0 |
26.0 |
33 |
21 |
18 |
16 |
18 |
73 |
6.2 |
| 2007 |
LAD |
0 |
2 |
6.64 |
22 |
12 |
0 |
20.1 |
26 |
16 |
15 |
9 |
13 |
68 |
5.8 |
| 17 Yrs |
67 |
71 |
3.45 |
1010 |
667 |
326 |
1071.1 |
1002 |
475 |
411 |
462 |
945 |
131 |
7.9 |
| 162 Game Avg. |
4 |
5 |
3.45 |
68 |
45 |
22 |
72 |
67 |
32 |
28 |
31 |
63 |
131 |
7.9 |
|
W |
L |
ERA |
G |
GF |
SV |
IP |
H |
R |
ER |
BB |
SO |
ERA+ |
SO/9 |
| CHW (7 yrs) |
29 |
24 |
2.87 |
345 |
299 |
161 |
404.2 |
339 |
146 |
129 |
156 |
411 |
153 |
9.1 |
| TBD (3 yrs) |
8 |
16 |
3.43 |
207 |
182 |
101 |
218.0 |
199 |
93 |
83 |
97 |
185 |
143 |
7.6 |
| KCR (2 yrs) |
6 |
9 |
4.21 |
116 |
97 |
54 |
119.2 |
131 |
63 |
56 |
38 |
85 |
116 |
6.4 |
| NYM (2 yrs) |
8 |
6 |
2.79 |
89 |
25 |
4 |
90.1 |
72 |
28 |
28 |
36 |
76 |
150 |
7.6 |
| PIT (1 yr) |
0 |
3 |
2.93 |
46 |
14 |
2 |
43.0 |
46 |
24 |
14 |
24 |
33 |
153 |
6.9 |
| SFG (1 yr) |
5 |
2 |
2.48 |
28 |
7 |
4 |
32.2 |
29 |
9 |
9 |
14 |
35 |
168 |
9.6 |
| PHI (1 yr) |
3 |
5 |
4.76 |
63 |
11 |
0 |
56.2 |
66 |
39 |
30 |
29 |
44 |
95 |
7.0 |
| ATL (1 yr) |
5 |
3 |
4.35 |
66 |
12 |
0 |
60.0 |
61 |
36 |
29 |
43 |
45 |
99 |
6.8 |
| LAD (1 yr) |
0 |
2 |
6.64 |
22 |
12 |
0 |
20.1 |
26 |
16 |
15 |
9 |
13 |
68 |
5.8 |
| CLE (1 yr) |
3 |
1 |
6.23 |
28 |
8 |
0 |
26.0 |
33 |
21 |
18 |
16 |
18 |
73 |
6.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| AL (13 yrs) |
46 |
50 |
3.35 |
696 |
586 |
316 |
768.1 |
702 |
323 |
286 |
307 |
699 |
138 |
8.2 |
| NL (6 yrs) |
21 |
21 |
3.71 |
314 |
81 |
10 |
303.0 |
300 |
152 |
125 |
155 |
246 |
117 |
7.3 |
Why He Should Get In
The question of Hernandez reaching the Hall Of Fame comes down to a question of how to judge his career. When you spend your entire career as a relief pitcher, and over half of it as a reliever that is not closing games, it becomes increasingly hard to judge your worth. He has over 300 saves in his career and an impressive 7.9 strikeouts per nine innings, but will it be enough?
Why He Should Not Get In
In short, relief pitchers that are not closers simply don’t find their way to Cooperstown. While Hernandez’s numbers were sufficient to make him a sought after arm for many years, it is hard to see his credentials ever ending with “Hall Of Famer”.
Bill Ivie is the editor here at I-70 Baseball
Follow him on Twitter here.
Posted in Cooperstown Choices 2013, I-70 Baseball Exclusives
Posted on 08 January 2013. Tags: 163, 192, Aaron Hall, Aaron Sele, All Star, Baseball, Career, Choices, Cooperstown, Election Announcement, Four Men, Game, Gf, Hall Of Fame, Ip, Ivie, Lad, Nbsp, Pitch, Profiles, Rookie Of The Year, Sammy Sosa, Sv
With the Hall Of Fame election announcement coming on January 9, 2013, it is time to review the ballot, go over the names, and decide who belongs in the Hall Of Fame.
There are twenty four men on the ballot for the first time this year and we will take a look at each one individually prior to official announcements. You can find all of the profiles in the I-70 Baseball Exclusives: Cooperstown Choices 2013 menu at the top of the page.
In this article, we take a look at Aaron Sele

Aaron Sele
The fifteen year career of Aaron Sele would see him pitch for six teams. He would finish third in the 1993 Rookie Of The Year voting and be selected for the All Star roster in 1998 and 2000.
| Year |
Tm |
W |
L |
ERA |
G |
GS |
GF |
SV |
IP |
H |
R |
ER |
SO |
ERA+ |
SO/9 |
| 1993 |
BOS |
7 |
2 |
2.74 |
18 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
111.2 |
100 |
42 |
34 |
93 |
170 |
7.5 |
| 1994 |
BOS |
8 |
7 |
3.83 |
22 |
22 |
0 |
0 |
143.1 |
140 |
68 |
61 |
105 |
131 |
6.6 |
| 1995 |
BOS |
3 |
1 |
3.06 |
6 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
32.1 |
32 |
14 |
11 |
21 |
160 |
5.8 |
| 1996 |
BOS |
7 |
11 |
5.32 |
29 |
29 |
0 |
0 |
157.1 |
192 |
110 |
93 |
137 |
95 |
7.8 |
| 1997 |
BOS |
13 |
12 |
5.38 |
33 |
33 |
0 |
0 |
177.1 |
196 |
115 |
106 |
122 |
87 |
6.2 |
| 1998 |
TEX |
19 |
11 |
4.23 |
33 |
33 |
0 |
0 |
212.2 |
239 |
116 |
100 |
167 |
113 |
7.1 |
| 1999 |
TEX |
18 |
9 |
4.79 |
33 |
33 |
0 |
0 |
205.0 |
244 |
115 |
109 |
186 |
106 |
8.2 |
| 2000 |
SEA |
17 |
10 |
4.51 |
34 |
34 |
0 |
0 |
211.2 |
221 |
110 |
106 |
137 |
102 |
5.8 |
| 2001 |
SEA |
15 |
5 |
3.60 |
34 |
33 |
0 |
0 |
215.0 |
216 |
93 |
86 |
114 |
115 |
4.8 |
| 2002 |
ANA |
8 |
9 |
4.89 |
26 |
26 |
0 |
0 |
160.0 |
190 |
92 |
87 |
82 |
91 |
4.6 |
| 2003 |
ANA |
7 |
11 |
5.77 |
25 |
25 |
0 |
0 |
121.2 |
135 |
82 |
78 |
53 |
76 |
3.9 |
| 2004 |
ANA |
9 |
4 |
5.05 |
28 |
24 |
1 |
0 |
132.0 |
163 |
84 |
74 |
51 |
88 |
3.5 |
| 2005 |
SEA |
6 |
12 |
5.66 |
21 |
21 |
0 |
0 |
116.0 |
147 |
76 |
73 |
53 |
74 |
4.1 |
| 2006 |
LAD |
8 |
6 |
4.53 |
28 |
15 |
4 |
0 |
103.1 |
120 |
57 |
52 |
57 |
100 |
5.0 |
| 2007 |
NYM |
3 |
2 |
5.37 |
34 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
53.2 |
78 |
34 |
32 |
29 |
81 |
4.9 |
| 15 Yrs |
148 |
112 |
4.61 |
404 |
352 |
15 |
0 |
2153.0 |
2413 |
1208 |
1102 |
1407 |
100 |
5.9 |
| 162 Game Avg. |
13 |
10 |
4.61 |
36 |
32 |
1 |
0 |
194 |
217 |
109 |
99 |
127 |
100 |
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BOS (5 yrs) |
38 |
33 |
4.41 |
108 |
108 |
0 |
0 |
622.0 |
660 |
349 |
305 |
478 |
110 |
6.9 |
| ANA (3 yrs) |
24 |
24 |
5.20 |
79 |
75 |
1 |
0 |
413.2 |
488 |
258 |
239 |
186 |
85 |
4.0 |
| SEA (3 yrs) |
38 |
27 |
4.39 |
89 |
88 |
0 |
0 |
542.2 |
584 |
279 |
265 |
304 |
98 |
5.0 |
| TEX (2 yrs) |
37 |
20 |
4.50 |
66 |
66 |
0 |
0 |
417.2 |
483 |
231 |
209 |
353 |
110 |
7.6 |
| NYM (1 yr) |
3 |
2 |
5.37 |
34 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
53.2 |
78 |
34 |
32 |
29 |
81 |
4.9 |
| LAD (1 yr) |
8 |
6 |
4.53 |
28 |
15 |
4 |
0 |
103.1 |
120 |
57 |
52 |
57 |
100 |
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| AL (13 yrs) |
137 |
104 |
4.59 |
342 |
337 |
1 |
0 |
1996.0 |
2215 |
1117 |
1018 |
1321 |
101 |
6.0 |
| NL (2 yrs) |
11 |
8 |
4.82 |
62 |
15 |
14 |
0 |
157.0 |
198 |
91 |
84 |
86 |
92 |
4.9 |
Why He Should Get In
Sele appeared to have a bright future ahead of him when he burst onto the scene, and for a stretch of about five years, it looked like he would develop into a top of the rotation starter.
Why He Should Not Get In
Five years does not make a career and leaves Sele well short of any of the Hall Of Fame numbers he would need. He never quite realized his potential and that will keep him from the halls of Cooperstown.
Bill Ivie is the editor here at I-70 Baseball
Follow him on Twitter here.
Posted in Cooperstown Choices 2013, I-70 Baseball Exclusives
Posted on 08 January 2013. Tags: Arizona Diamondbacks, Assignment Editor, Baseball, Big Game, Boston Red Sox, Choices, Cooperstown, Curt Schilling, Cy Young, Cy Young Award, Election Announcement, Epitome, Four Men, Game, Hall Of Fame, Ip, Ivie, Nbsp, Phi, Profiles, Radio, Star Appearances, Three Times, World Championships
With the Hall Of Fame election announcement coming on January 9, 2013, it is time to review the ballot, go over the names, and decide who belongs in the Hall Of Fame.
There are twenty four men on the ballot for the first time this year and we will take a look at each one individually prior to official announcements. You can find all of the profiles in the I-70 Baseball Exclusives: Cooperstown Choices 2013 menu at the top of the page.
In this article, we take a look at Curt Schilling

Curt Schilling
The epitome of the term “big game pitcher”, Curt Schilling was the pitcher that helped the Arizona Diamondbacks and the Boston Red Sox to World Championships. His 20 year career was highlighted with six all star appearances and finished second in the
Cy Young Award voting three times. He also finished in the top 15 of the Most Valuable Player voting four times in his career.
| Year |
Tm |
W |
L |
ERA |
G |
GS |
CG |
SHO |
IP |
H |
R |
ER |
BB |
SO |
ERA+ |
SO/9 |
| 1988 |
BAL |
0 |
3 |
9.82 |
4 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
14.2 |
22 |
19 |
16 |
10 |
4 |
41 |
2.5 |
| 1989 |
BAL |
0 |
1 |
6.23 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
8.2 |
10 |
6 |
6 |
3 |
6 |
63 |
6.2 |
| 1990 |
BAL |
1 |
2 |
2.54 |
35 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
46.0 |
38 |
13 |
13 |
19 |
32 |
151 |
6.3 |
| 1991 |
HOU |
3 |
5 |
3.81 |
56 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
75.2 |
79 |
35 |
32 |
39 |
71 |
92 |
8.4 |
| 1992 |
PHI |
14 |
11 |
2.35 |
42 |
26 |
10 |
4 |
226.1 |
165 |
67 |
59 |
59 |
147 |
150 |
5.8 |
| 1993 |
PHI |
16 |
7 |
4.02 |
34 |
34 |
7 |
2 |
235.1 |
234 |
114 |
105 |
57 |
186 |
99 |
7.1 |
| 1994 |
PHI |
2 |
8 |
4.48 |
13 |
13 |
1 |
0 |
82.1 |
87 |
42 |
41 |
28 |
58 |
96 |
6.3 |
| 1995 |
PHI |
7 |
5 |
3.57 |
17 |
17 |
1 |
0 |
116.0 |
96 |
52 |
46 |
26 |
114 |
118 |
8.8 |
| 1996 |
PHI |
9 |
10 |
3.19 |
26 |
26 |
8 |
2 |
183.1 |
149 |
69 |
65 |
50 |
182 |
134 |
8.9 |
| 1997 |
PHI |
17 |
11 |
2.97 |
35 |
35 |
7 |
2 |
254.1 |
208 |
96 |
84 |
58 |
319 |
143 |
11.3 |
| 1998 |
PHI |
15 |
14 |
3.25 |
35 |
35 |
15 |
2 |
268.2 |
236 |
101 |
97 |
61 |
300 |
134 |
10.0 |
| 1999 |
PHI |
15 |
6 |
3.54 |
24 |
24 |
8 |
1 |
180.1 |
159 |
74 |
71 |
44 |
152 |
136 |
7.6 |
| 2000 |
TOT |
11 |
12 |
3.81 |
29 |
29 |
8 |
2 |
210.1 |
204 |
90 |
89 |
45 |
168 |
124 |
7.2 |
| 2000 |
PHI |
6 |
6 |
3.91 |
16 |
16 |
4 |
1 |
112.2 |
110 |
49 |
49 |
32 |
96 |
120 |
7.7 |
| 2000 |
ARI |
5 |
6 |
3.69 |
13 |
13 |
4 |
1 |
97.2 |
94 |
41 |
40 |
13 |
72 |
130 |
6.6 |
| 2001 |
ARI |
22 |
6 |
2.98 |
35 |
35 |
6 |
1 |
256.2 |
237 |
86 |
85 |
39 |
293 |
157 |
10.3 |
| 2002 |
ARI |
23 |
7 |
3.23 |
36 |
35 |
5 |
1 |
259.1 |
218 |
95 |
93 |
33 |
316 |
140 |
11.0 |
| 2003 |
ARI |
8 |
9 |
2.95 |
24 |
24 |
3 |
2 |
168.0 |
144 |
58 |
55 |
32 |
194 |
159 |
10.4 |
| 2004 |
BOS |
21 |
6 |
3.26 |
32 |
32 |
3 |
0 |
226.2 |
206 |
84 |
82 |
35 |
203 |
148 |
8.1 |
| 2005 |
BOS |
8 |
8 |
5.69 |
32 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
93.1 |
121 |
59 |
59 |
22 |
87 |
80 |
8.4 |
| 2006 |
BOS |
15 |
7 |
3.97 |
31 |
31 |
0 |
0 |
204.0 |
220 |
90 |
90 |
28 |
183 |
120 |
8.1 |
| 2007 |
BOS |
9 |
8 |
3.87 |
24 |
24 |
1 |
1 |
151.0 |
165 |
68 |
65 |
23 |
101 |
123 |
6.0 |
| 20 Yrs |
216 |
146 |
3.46 |
569 |
436 |
83 |
20 |
3261.0 |
2998 |
1318 |
1253 |
711 |
3116 |
127 |
8.6 |
| 162 Game Avg. |
15 |
10 |
3.46 |
38 |
30 |
6 |
1 |
221 |
203 |
89 |
85 |
48 |
211 |
127 |
8.6 |
|
W |
L |
ERA |
G |
GS |
CG |
SHO |
IP |
H |
R |
ER |
BB |
SO |
ERA+ |
SO/9 |
| PHI (9 yrs) |
101 |
78 |
3.35 |
242 |
226 |
61 |
14 |
1659.1 |
1444 |
664 |
617 |
415 |
1554 |
126 |
8.4 |
| ARI (4 yrs) |
58 |
28 |
3.14 |
108 |
107 |
18 |
5 |
781.2 |
693 |
280 |
273 |
117 |
875 |
148 |
10.1 |
| BOS (4 yrs) |
53 |
29 |
3.95 |
119 |
98 |
4 |
1 |
675.0 |
712 |
301 |
296 |
108 |
574 |
120 |
7.7 |
| BAL (3 yrs) |
1 |
6 |
4.54 |
44 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
69.1 |
70 |
38 |
35 |
32 |
42 |
85 |
5.5 |
| HOU (1 yr) |
3 |
5 |
3.81 |
56 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
75.2 |
79 |
35 |
32 |
39 |
71 |
92 |
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| NL (13 yrs) |
162 |
111 |
3.30 |
406 |
333 |
79 |
19 |
2516.2 |
2216 |
979 |
922 |
571 |
2500 |
131 |
8.9 |
| AL (7 yrs) |
54 |
35 |
4.00 |
163 |
103 |
4 |
1 |
744.1 |
782 |
339 |
331 |
140 |
616 |
117 |
7.4 |
Why He Should Get In
Schilling’s case is one that is defined by his performance in big games and the postseason. While most of his regular season stats put him as a borderline hall of famer, his postseason numbers are seldom rivaled. With a 11-2 record, a 2.23 earned run average, an average of over 7 innings per start, a WHIP below one and a strikeout per nine innings over eight, his postseason prowess will have many clamoring for his induction based on the postseason alone.
Why He Should Not Get In
Yes, he was a huge pitcher in the postseason and had monumental success on the biggest stage. That being said, he does not have the hardware to back up his claim to Cooperstown. Finishing second multiple times for the Cy Young Award simply makes him the second best pitcher during those seasons. According to Baseball-Reference, he ranks as a slighly above the average hall of fame pitcher (according to the Jaffe WAR Score System). However, advanced statistics have yet to play a large influence on hall of fame voters.
Bill Ivie is the editor here at I-70 Baseball
Follow him on Twitter here.
Posted in Cooperstown Choices 2013, I-70 Baseball Exclusives
Posted on 08 January 2013. Tags: Baseball, Choices, Cleveland Indians, Cooperstown, Cy Young, Cy Young Award, Election Announcement, Era, Four Men, Gf, Hall Of Fame, Ip, Ivie, Jose Mesa, League Career, Major League, Nbsp, Phi, Profiles, Sv
With the Hall Of Fame election announcement coming on January 9, 2013, it is time to review the ballot, go over the names, and decide who belongs in the Hall Of Fame.
There are twenty four men on the ballot for the first time this year and we will take a look at each one individually prior to official announcements. You can find all of the profiles in the I-70 Baseball Exclusives: Cooperstown Choices 2013 menu at the top of the page.
In this article, we take a look at Jose Mesa

Jose Mesa
Mesa’s 19 year major league career spanned eight teams, most notably the Cleveland Indians. While in Cleveland he would be selected to two All Star rosters, finish second in the 1995
Cy Young Award voting and fourth in the 1995 Most Valuable Player voting.
| Year |
Tm |
W |
L |
ERA |
G |
GS |
GF |
SV |
IP |
H |
R |
ER |
BB |
SO |
ERA+ |
SO/9 |
| 1987 |
BAL |
1 |
3 |
6.03 |
6 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
31.1 |
38 |
23 |
21 |
15 |
17 |
73 |
4.9 |
| 1990 |
BAL |
3 |
2 |
3.86 |
7 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
46.2 |
37 |
20 |
20 |
27 |
24 |
99 |
4.6 |
| 1991 |
BAL |
6 |
11 |
5.97 |
23 |
23 |
0 |
0 |
123.2 |
151 |
86 |
82 |
62 |
64 |
67 |
4.7 |
| 1992 |
TOT |
7 |
12 |
4.59 |
28 |
27 |
1 |
0 |
160.2 |
169 |
86 |
82 |
70 |
62 |
86 |
3.5 |
| 1992 |
BAL |
3 |
8 |
5.19 |
13 |
12 |
1 |
0 |
67.2 |
77 |
41 |
39 |
27 |
22 |
77 |
2.9 |
| 1992 |
CLE |
4 |
4 |
4.16 |
15 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
93.0 |
92 |
45 |
43 |
43 |
40 |
94 |
3.9 |
| 1993 |
CLE |
10 |
12 |
4.92 |
34 |
33 |
0 |
0 |
208.2 |
232 |
122 |
114 |
62 |
118 |
88 |
5.1 |
| 1994 |
CLE |
7 |
5 |
3.82 |
51 |
0 |
22 |
2 |
73.0 |
71 |
33 |
31 |
26 |
63 |
123 |
7.8 |
| 1995 |
CLE |
3 |
0 |
1.13 |
62 |
0 |
57 |
46 |
64.0 |
49 |
9 |
8 |
17 |
58 |
418 |
8.2 |
| 1996 |
CLE |
2 |
7 |
3.73 |
69 |
0 |
60 |
39 |
72.1 |
69 |
32 |
30 |
28 |
64 |
130 |
8.0 |
| 1997 |
CLE |
4 |
4 |
2.40 |
66 |
0 |
38 |
16 |
82.1 |
83 |
28 |
22 |
28 |
69 |
195 |
7.5 |
| 1998 |
TOT |
8 |
7 |
4.57 |
76 |
0 |
36 |
1 |
84.2 |
91 |
50 |
43 |
38 |
63 |
99 |
6.7 |
| 1998 |
CLE |
3 |
4 |
5.17 |
44 |
0 |
18 |
1 |
54.0 |
61 |
36 |
31 |
20 |
35 |
92 |
5.8 |
| 1998 |
SFG |
5 |
3 |
3.52 |
32 |
0 |
18 |
0 |
30.2 |
30 |
14 |
12 |
18 |
28 |
116 |
8.2 |
| 1999 |
SEA |
3 |
6 |
4.98 |
68 |
0 |
60 |
33 |
68.2 |
84 |
42 |
38 |
40 |
42 |
100 |
5.5 |
| 2000 |
SEA |
4 |
6 |
5.36 |
66 |
0 |
29 |
1 |
80.2 |
89 |
48 |
48 |
41 |
84 |
86 |
9.4 |
| 2001 |
PHI |
3 |
3 |
2.34 |
71 |
0 |
59 |
42 |
69.1 |
65 |
26 |
18 |
20 |
59 |
182 |
7.7 |
| 2002 |
PHI |
4 |
6 |
2.97 |
74 |
0 |
64 |
45 |
75.2 |
65 |
26 |
25 |
39 |
64 |
131 |
7.6 |
| 2003 |
PHI |
5 |
7 |
6.52 |
61 |
0 |
47 |
24 |
58.0 |
71 |
44 |
42 |
31 |
45 |
62 |
7.0 |
| 2004 |
PIT |
5 |
2 |
3.25 |
70 |
0 |
65 |
43 |
69.1 |
78 |
26 |
25 |
20 |
37 |
132 |
4.8 |
| 2005 |
PIT |
2 |
8 |
4.76 |
55 |
0 |
48 |
27 |
56.2 |
61 |
30 |
30 |
26 |
37 |
88 |
5.9 |
| 2006 |
COL |
1 |
5 |
3.86 |
79 |
0 |
26 |
1 |
72.1 |
73 |
32 |
31 |
36 |
39 |
128 |
4.9 |
| 2007 |
TOT |
2 |
3 |
7.11 |
56 |
0 |
21 |
1 |
50.2 |
53 |
48 |
40 |
25 |
29 |
65 |
5.2 |
| 2007 |
DET |
1 |
1 |
12.34 |
16 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
11.2 |
19 |
16 |
16 |
6 |
9 |
38 |
6.9 |
| 2007 |
PHI |
1 |
2 |
5.54 |
40 |
0 |
13 |
1 |
39.0 |
34 |
32 |
24 |
19 |
20 |
83 |
4.6 |
| 19 Yrs |
80 |
109 |
4.36 |
1022 |
95 |
633 |
321 |
1548.2 |
1629 |
811 |
750 |
651 |
1038 |
100 |
6.0 |
| 162 Game Avg. |
5 |
7 |
4.36 |
62 |
6 |
39 |
20 |
94 |
99 |
49 |
46 |
40 |
63 |
100 |
6.0 |
|
W |
L |
ERA |
G |
GS |
GF |
SV |
IP |
H |
R |
ER |
BB |
SO |
ERA+ |
SO/9 |
| CLE (7 yrs) |
33 |
36 |
3.88 |
341 |
48 |
195 |
104 |
647.1 |
657 |
305 |
279 |
224 |
447 |
116 |
6.2 |
| PHI (4 yrs) |
13 |
18 |
4.05 |
246 |
0 |
183 |
112 |
242.0 |
235 |
128 |
109 |
109 |
188 |
102 |
7.0 |
| BAL (4 yrs) |
13 |
24 |
5.41 |
49 |
47 |
1 |
0 |
269.1 |
303 |
170 |
162 |
131 |
127 |
74 |
4.2 |
| PIT (2 yrs) |
7 |
10 |
3.93 |
125 |
0 |
113 |
70 |
126.0 |
139 |
56 |
55 |
46 |
74 |
108 |
5.3 |
| SEA (2 yrs) |
7 |
12 |
5.18 |
134 |
0 |
89 |
34 |
149.1 |
173 |
90 |
86 |
81 |
126 |
92 |
7.6 |
| COL (1 yr) |
1 |
5 |
3.86 |
79 |
0 |
26 |
1 |
72.1 |
73 |
32 |
31 |
36 |
39 |
128 |
4.9 |
| SFG (1 yr) |
5 |
3 |
3.52 |
32 |
0 |
18 |
0 |
30.2 |
30 |
14 |
12 |
18 |
28 |
116 |
8.2 |
| DET (1 yr) |
1 |
1 |
12.34 |
16 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
11.2 |
19 |
16 |
16 |
6 |
9 |
38 |
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| AL (13 yrs) |
54 |
73 |
4.53 |
540 |
95 |
293 |
138 |
1077.2 |
1152 |
581 |
543 |
442 |
709 |
97 |
5.9 |
| NL (8 yrs) |
26 |
36 |
3.96 |
482 |
0 |
340 |
183 |
471.0 |
477 |
230 |
207 |
209 |
329 |
108 |
6.3 |
Why He Should Get In
His 321 saves ranks him 14th in major league baseball over his career. For a good portion of his career, he was considered one of the best closers in baseball.
Why He Should Not Get In
Closers are still not getting into the Hall Of Fame easily and Mesa would have a hill to climb to get there. With players ahead of him with more than 400 saves, he will be hard pressed to force his way in to Cooperstown.
Bill Ivie is the editor here at I-70 Baseball
Follow him on Twitter here.
Posted in Cooperstown Choices 2013, I-70 Baseball Exclusives